DD2371 Automata Theory, VT08
Course Evaluation
In the questions below, please use the following numeric evaluation
scheme:
1 very bad, 2 bad, 3 rather bad, 4 rather good,
5 good, 6 very good.
General Questions
1: How well was the course goal made clear at the beginning of the
course? [5.6]
2: How would you evaluate the course book? [4.3]
3: How useful did you find the course web pages? [4.4]
Lectures and Tutorials
4: What percentage of lectures did you attend?
5: What use did you have of the lectures and tutorials? [5.1]
6: How well did the exercise sessions fit the material covered in the
lectures? [5.5]
- good idea to combine them
7: How was the lecturer didactically speaking? [5.4]
8: How enthusiastic and motivated was the lecturer? [5.9]
9: How well did the lecturer answer questions? [5.6]
10: How friendly and helpful was the lecturer during breaks, in
e-mails, etc? [5.7]
11: Did the lecturer use available tools appropriately (OH, video,
etc)? [4.8]
Environment
12: How was the lecture room concerning light, acoustics, and air? [5.3]
Gender-related questions [no scale]
13. Do you perceive to have been treated differently in this course
because of gender, sexual orientation, ethnic belonging or handicap? If
yes, in what way?
- no problems
14. How would you rate the course from a gender perspective (as for
example
related to course material, course syllabus, lecturer etc.)?
- gender neutral, which is very good
Other questions [no scale]
15: How meaningful do you consider the course?
- good theoretical foundation
- it was a fun course, but I'm not
sure how much practical meaning it has
- what can I have this stuff for?
- very meaningful, gives an important
basis for computer scence
16: Did you have all prerequisite knowledge for the course?
- yes [all but one answer]
- I have not taken a course in logics
[one answer]
17: Your concrete suggestions for improving the course:
- relate to the real world more, if
possible
- provide solutions to recommended
exercises
- more solved exercises
- would be good to have dedicated
problem solving sessions
- maybe logic should be a requirement
18: Other comments:
- some lectures covered 3-4 of the
harder chapters which felt a bit much
- one of the most difficult courses so
far