DD2452 Formal Methods, VT08
Course Evaluation
In the questions below, please use the following numeric evaluation
scheme:
1 very bad, 2 bad, 3 rather bad, 4 rather good,
5 good, 6 very good.
General Questions
1: How well was the course goal made clear at the beginning of the
course? [5.3]
2: How would you rate the course book? [4.3]
3: How useful did you find the course web pages? [5.1]
Lectures and Tutorials
4: What percentage of lectures did you attend?
5: What use did you have of the lectures and tutorials? [5.1]
6: How well did the exercise sessions fit the material covered in the
lectures? [4.9]
7: How was the lecturer didactically speaking? [5.3]
8: How enthusiastic and motivated was the lecturer? [5.8]
- he loves the course, and it shows
9: How well did the lecturer answer questions? [5.6]
- I can't imagine how anyone could
give better answers
- the answers were usually good but
did often answer the wrong question
10: How friendly and helpful was the lecturer during breaks, in
e-mails, etc? [5.3]
11: Did the lecturer use available tools appropriately (OH, video,
etc)? [4.6]
Lab Assignments
12: What use did you have of the lab assignments? [5.0]
13: How well did the lab assignments fit the material covered in the
lectures? [4.9]
- the major problem was the quality of
the documentation for the tools
Environment
14: How was the lecture room concerning light, acoustics, and air? [5.0]
General
15: How meaningful do you consider the course? [4.6]
- interesting but narrow
16: Did you have all prerequisite knowledge for the course? [4.9]
- maybe a bit weak in logics
17: Your suggestions for improving the course:
- size of labs was a little too large
w.r.t. the given time
- if possible, give more practical uses for the material
- provide small how-to's for the labs
- find book(s) that cover the whole material
18: Other comments:
- do not drop part two, but you are
right that the end gets a bit compressed
- don't take away part two! I liked that lab the most
- great teaching skills
- the lecture notes covered well what the book did not