2D1454 Semantics for Programming
Languages, HT06
Course Evaluation: Results
In the questions below, please use the following numeric evaluation
scheme:
1 very bad, 2 bad, 3 rather bad, 4 rather good, 5 good, 6 very good.
General Questions
1: How well was the course goal made clear at the beginning of the
course? [5.0]
2: How would you evaluate the course book? [3.8]
3: How useful did you find the course web pages? [3.9]
Lectures and Tutorials
4: What percentage of lectures did you attend? [95%]
5: What use did you have of the lectures and tutorials? [5.5]
6: How well did the exercise sessions fit the material covered in the
lectures? [5.4]
7: How was the lecturer didactically speaking? [5.6]
8: How enthusiastic and motivated was the lecturer? [5.6]
9: How well did the lecturer answer questions? [5.6]
10: How friendly and helpful was the lecturer during breaks, in
e-mails, etc? [5.5]
11: Did the lecturer use avalable tools appropriately (OH, video, etc)?
[4.8]
Environment
12: How was the lecture room concerning light, acoustics, and air? [4.1]
General
13: How meaningful do you consider the course? [5.0]
14: Did you have all prerequisite knowledge for the course? [5.4]
15: Your suggestions for improving the course:
- More practical exercises
- Some concrete examples
- Include some homeworks perhaps
16: Other comments:
- Thank you for the excellent course