Comments on the book:
There are too many questions left unanswered. I mean, that's the way the book is written with all the problem sets, however, for the course and exam preparation it was not always helpful.
---
Seemed to repeat a lot of proof not outlining how each was different.
---
too expensive, first 150 pages useless
Comments on the homepage:
Just be sure to check the due dates each time...
---
All necessary information was on there. However, the links to the old exams could have also been put on the current page.
Comments on the lectures (constructive suggestions welcome):
Somethimes I didn't get the point of change- when he started to talk about something else. Do not be so confusiong, explain everything properly
---
One of the best lecturers I ever had
---
I thing for time dependent problem should develop.
---
The lecturer speaks and writes well.
---
I liked Murtazo's rational perspective on things. The lecture was very interestingly presented.
---
When some thesis/equations were introduced, I did not fully understand why were they significant at that moment - perhaps more reference to the practical implementation should be done while proceeding with theory.
---
I found the lecturer moving a bit fast in some of the lectures. The exrecise sessions really proved worthwhile. The topics that were not completely clear to me in theory lectures were made clear when I attended the exercise seissions. The frequency with which exercise sessions were arranged was very good.
Comments on the excercise sessions (constructive suggestions are welcome):
I think we were repeating uselessly a lot of things, some of the exercises were very obvious and easy, it was not sufficient preparation for the test
---
Teacher was very confusing and not helpful enough.
---
The exercise sessions really proved very useful in making the unclear concepts clear.
Comments on the computer sessions:
I didn't attend much of them I think it would be more helpful to offer the private consultating only, I prefere to work on it at home and consult only the gaps in it
---
The software could have been explained making programming a lot easier.
Comments on the laboration:
maybe there could be more of them
---
Great application of the knowledge obtained in classes.
---
The Lab was okay from the amount of work. The reports are always a little bit disturbing.
Comments on the project:
I liked it, it was theory turned to praxis
---
Great application of the knowledge obtained in classes.
---
Some tasks were rather easy with Puffin, other ones pretty hard.
---
It was rather hard, I understood what i was trying to do however it proved hard.
Comments on part A and B of the problem sheet:
Easy
A longer mathematical introduction is needed.
---
should give more lectures on time dependent problem.
---
The course was interesant, but I don't think that the theory introduced enables me to fully understand and implement FEM.
The theoretical part of the course is very hard for the students coming from the engineering field. This is why the project and the lab is done with a great ease, and the exam went really difficult.
---
5 hours was not enough for written exam. There was not any time to think during exam.
---
i spend too much time writing my result in latex. maybe it is better to concentrate more on the content!
---
I found it very interesting to see some practical things that were shown during the last lecture.
Denna sammanställning har genererats med ACE.