Exam questionnaire for Master's programmes at CSC

Results

  1. Which is your sex?

    1. 0% (0 st) Female.
    2. 100% (3 st) Male.

  2. Which programme did you follow?

    1. 67% (2 st) Master's programme in Scientific computing (1.5 year).
    2. 33% (1 st) Master's programme in Scientific computing (2 years).
    3. 0% (0 st) Master's programme in Media management (2 years).

  3. What year did you start the programme?

    2006
    ---
    2003
    ---
    2003

  4. In your opinion was your previous knowledge sufficient when you started the programme?

    1. 0% (0 st) Yes, even more than sufficient.
    2. 67% (2 st) Yes.
    3. 33% (1 st) On the whole, yes.
    4. 0% (0 st) No, not quite.
    5. 0% (0 st) No, not at all.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    If your answer was no, what do you think was missing?

  5. Has the programme lived up to the expectations you had when you enrolled?

    1. 33% (1 st) Yes, it even exceeded my expectations.
    2. 0% (0 st) Yes, entirely.
    3. 67% (2 st) On the whole, yes.
    4. 0% (0 st) No, not quite.
    5. 0% (0 st) No, not at all.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  6. Do you think that the pace of the tuition has been appropriate in general?

    1. 0% (0 st) Too fast.
    2. 67% (2 st) On the whole just right.
    3. 33% (1 st) Too slow.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  7. Do you think that the work load has been adequate?

    1. 0% (0 st) Too high.
    2. 100% (3 st) On the whole quite adequate.
    3. 0% (0 st) Too low.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

    The amount of work done for each courses did not always match the number of points given for it, for example Numeriska Metoder took a lot of work but didn't give many points.

  8. What would you like to change in the combination of the different types of tuition in the mandatory courses of the programme? (You can choose several alternatives.)

    1. 33% (1 st) No change.
    2. 33% (1 st) More lectures.
    3. 0% (0 st) Fewer lectures.
    4. 67% (2 st) More practicals (övningar).
    5. 0% (0 st) Fewer practicals.
    6. 33% (1 st) More extra practise (räknestugor).
    7. 0% (0 st) Less extra practise.
    8. 67% (2 st) More laboratory sessions.
    9. 0% (0 st) Fewer laboratory sessions.
    10. 67% (2 st) More projects.
    11. 0% (0 st) Fewer projects.

    Other suggestions, like giving an example of a course and a desired change:

    more of this and less of "home work"

  9. What changes would you like in the mix of different types of examinations in the mandatory courses of the programme? (You can choose several alternatives.)

    1. 67% (2 st) No change.
    2. 33% (1 st) More written examinations and tests.
    3. 0% (0 st) Fewer written examinations and tests.
    4. 33% (1 st) More individual oral examinations.
    5. 0% (0 st) Fewer individual oral examinations.
    6. 33% (1 st) More laboratory work.
    7. 0% (0 st) Less laboratory work.
    8. 67% (2 st) More project reports.
    9. 0% (0 st) Less project reports.
    10. 33% (1 st) More hand-in assignments.
    11. 0% (0 st) Fewer hand-in assignments.

    Other suggestions, like giving an example of a course and the desired change in its examination:

    less home work and learn at live sessions

  10. Which courses do you think should be coordinated better and how (e.g. with accompanying laboratory assignments, less overlap, assurance of prior knowledge)?

    Mekanik
    ---
    dono

    What do you think about the proportion of the following contents in your programme?
    When you reply please take into consideration the entire length of the programme (1.5 or 2 years).

  11. Proficiency training in writing?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 100% (3 st) Too little.
    3. 0% (0 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  12. Proficiency training in oral presentation?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 100% (3 st) Too little.
    3. 0% (0 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  13. Self reflection?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 67% (2 st) Too little.
    3. 33% (1 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  14. Group and project work?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 0% (0 st) Too little.
    3. 100% (3 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  15. Problem solving?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 67% (2 st) Too little.
    3. 33% (1 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  16. Programming?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 67% (2 st) Too little.
    3. 33% (1 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  17. Space for freedom of choice in the programme?

    1. 0% (0 st) Far too little.
    2. 0% (0 st) Too little.
    3. 100% (3 st) Just right.
    4. 0% (0 st) Too much.
    5. 0% (0 st) Far too much.
    6. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  18. Have you experienced the subject content in the courses as adequate and up-to-date?

    1. 67% (2 st) Absolutely.
    2. 33% (1 st) Partly.
    3. 0% (0 st) Not at all.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  19. Do you think that the programme has been diverse enough for its subject area?

    1. 33% (1 st) Absolutely.
    2. 67% (2 st) Partly.
    3. 0% (0 st) Not at all.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  20. Are you satisfied with the number of optional courses in the programme?

    1. 67% (2 st) Absolutely.
    2. 33% (1 st) Partly.
    3. 0% (0 st) Not at all.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  21. Would you have benefited from being able to discuss the choice of courses with a teacher before the selection periods?

    1. 33% (1 st) Absolutely.
    2. 33% (1 st) Partly.
    3. 0% (0 st) Not at all.
    4. 33% (1 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  22. Are you satisfied with the programme from a gender perspective?

    1. 67% (2 st) Absolutely.
    2. 0% (0 st) Partly.
    3. 33% (1 st) Not at all.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  23. Have you been discriminated against during your studies due to gender, ethnicity, sexuality, religion, physical handicap or social status?

    1. 0% (0 st) Yes.
    2. 100% (3 st) No.
    3. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  24. Have the teachers in their teaching, when relevant, problematized differences like gender, ethnicity, sexuality etc. in relation to technical development and technical applications?

    1. 0% (0 st) Absolutely.
    2. 0% (0 st) Partly.
    3. 67% (2 st) Not at all.
    4. 33% (1 st) Don't know.

    Comments:

  25. Comments on the degree project:

    total freedom, great! love it!

  26. Do you feel that you are behind schedule with your degree in relation to the nominal time of study?

    1. 33% (1 st) Yes.
    2. 67% (2 st) No.

    If you have answered yes, what are the main reasons for the delay?

    Didn't find thesis project right away. Had problem closing out the project.

  27. Have you already, before taking your degree, through employment or your own company, made sure of an occupation related to your education and that can support you?

    1. 67% (2 st) Yes.
    2. 33% (1 st) Not yet, but soon.
    3. 0% (0 st) No.
    4. 0% (0 st) Don't know.

  28. Other comments.
    Here you can express your views on items that have not been part of this questionnaire e.g. if you think that something has been particularly positive or negative during your studies.

viggo@nada.kth.se

This evaluation compilation was generated with ACE.